过去几年市场上普遍认为，两卧的升值表现不如三卧四卧。
但如果我们把问题拆开来看，会发现一个很容易被忽略的因素，那就是两房的入场价格。
过去的Stirling Residences / Parc Esta / Treasure at Tampines，开盘时两卧尺价都比三房高。到了交房后，两卧和三卧的尺价逐渐接近，甚至三卧反超。
所以两卧涨得少，其中一个因素是两卧当初入场时已经买贵了。
而现在的Thomson Reserve，如果两卧尺价反而低于三卧，那么它的入场逻辑其实已经和过去不一样。
这期我们就从两房和三房的入场价格和历史涨幅，重新看Thomson Reserve两房到底值不值得考虑。
________
In recent years, the market has generally believed that 2 bedroom units tend to underperform 3 and 4 bedroom units in terms of capital appreciation.
But if we break it down, there’s one factor that’s often overlooked: the entry price of 2 bedroom units.
Take Stirling Residences, Parc Esta, and Treasure at Tampines. At launch, the PSF of their 2 bedroom units was higher than their 3 bedroom units. By the time they reached TOP, the PSF gap had narrowed, and in some cases, 3 bedroom units had overtaken 2 bedroom units.
So one reason why 2 bedroom units underperformed is that they were already more expensive on a PSF basis when buyers entered.
Now, if Thomson Reserve’s 2 bedroom units are actually priced lower on a PSF basis than its 3 bedroom units, the entry equation is very different from what we saw in the past.
So in this video, we’ll look at Thomson Reserve’s 2 bedroom units from two angles: entry price and historical performance, and see whether they’re actually worth considering.